Live widget hidden — enable in cookie settings
Asia-Pacific Top Movers: Monday, August 24

Asia-Pacific Top Movers: Monday, August 24

Asia-Pacific top movers cover image for August 24, 2026

Asia-Pacific Top Movers: Monday, August 24

1 view     15 hours ago
8 min read
Text Size
Key PointsAbout This Summary iAn AI tool helped create this summary based on the text of the article. The Luna3 team has checked it for accuracy and revised as necessary. Read more about how we use AI in our publishing process.
  • 005930 led South Korea with a -8.70% move on 2026-08-24
  • Covered 10 exchanges — 10 with notable gainers, 10 with notable decliners
  • Includes ASX, HKEX, mainland China, TSE, SGX, KOSPI, TWSE, NSE, and NZX coverage

Session at a Glance

Samsung and Alibaba drag Asia tech lower as mega-cap dilution and payout disappointment trigger broad selloff.

ASX 200 Australia ▲ +0.49%
Nikkei 225 Japan ▼ -0.74%
Hang Seng Hong Kong ▼ -1.89%
Shanghai Composite China ▼ -0.59%
Taiwan TAIEX Taiwan ▼ -1.02%
KOSPI South Korea ▼ -3.12%
Straits Times Index Singapore ▼ -0.11%
Nifty 50 India ▼ -0.39%

Two of Asia’s biggest tech names set the tone Monday. Alibaba tumbled after pricing a $10.2 billion share placement at an 8.4% discount to fund AI infrastructure, while Samsung plunged after its record ₩110 trillion shareholder-return plan fell short of investor expectations for buybacks and cancellations. The one-two punch dragged the KOSPI down over 3% and the Hang Seng nearly 2%.

Australia bucked the trend — the ASX 200 added 0.49%, helped by materials strength and insulation from the tech-heavy selloff. Japan’s Nikkei slipped 0.74% as SoftBank weighed on sentiment with its own record bond-issuance overhang. Across the region, the pattern was consistent: mega-cap tech under pressure while defensive and value pockets held up, with LG Chem surging 8% in Seoul even as Samsung cratered next door.

The cross-border theme is clear — markets are punishing companies that are raising capital or leveraging up for AI buildouts while rewarding names with cleaner balance sheets or activist-driven re-rating catalysts.

Here are the standout movers across Asia-Pacific’s major exchanges for the session of Monday, August 24, grouped by market.

Australia (ASX)

↑ MIN +4.19%

Mid-cap · 69.07 (local)

Why: No single headline — Mineral Resources rallied alongside broader materials strength as the ASX outperformed the region, with iron ore and lithium sentiment steady after recent project restarts.

Pattern: Momentum continuation within a longer recovery trend — MIN has roughly doubled from its August 2025 lows. Move looks sector-driven rather than stock-specific, tracking resource sentiment.

↓ WOW -0.82%

Large-cap · 38.54 (local)

Why: No clear catalyst — Woolworths drifted lower in a session where defensive consumer staples underperformed the materials-led ASX rally. Light selling on a quiet tape.

Pattern: Sector rotation away from defensives into cyclicals on a risk-on ASX day. The -0.82% move is noise-level for a large-cap grocer — no pattern signal here.

Hong Kong (HKEX)

↑ 2628 +2.14%

Mid-cap · 28.66 (local)

Why: China Life Insurance gained as investors rotated into mainland financials and insurers, which benefit from rising bond yields and sit outside the tech-dilution selloff hitting Hong Kong.

Pattern: Defensive rotation trade — insurers and financials tend to catch a bid when tech sells off hard. The +2.14% move is a relative-strength signal within a weak Hang Seng session.

↓ 9988 -8.54%

Mega-cap · 112.5 (local)

Why: Alibaba dropped 8.5% after pricing a HK$80 billion share placement at HK$112.70 — an 8.4% discount to Friday’s close — to fund AI chips and infrastructure. Largest primary follow-on ever in Hong Kong.

Pattern: Classic dilution gap-down. The placement price at HK$112.70 acts as near-term gravity — expect the stock to trade around that level until the overhang clears. Not a mean-reversion setup yet.

China — Shanghai (SSE)

↑ 601318 +2.94%

Large-cap · 54.92 (local)

Why: Ping An Insurance rallied as Chinese financials attracted rotation flows during the tech selloff. Insurers benefit from a steepening yield curve and sit outside AI-capex dilution risk.

Pattern: Same defensive-rotation pattern as China Life (2628.HK). The +2.94% move is notable relative strength in a -0.59% Shanghai session — suggests institutional rebalancing into financials.

↓ 601857 -0.27%

Large-cap · 11.17 (local)

Why: PetroChina edged lower as crude oil weakened on Trump’s pledge of economic pressure on Iran, which paradoxically signals potential supply increases if sanctions shift diplomatic dynamics.

Pattern: Minimal move at -0.27% — essentially flat. No pattern signal; PetroChina is a low-beta state-owned name that rarely moves meaningfully on a single session’s oil headlines.

China — Shenzhen (SZSE)

↑ 000333 +2.00%

Large-cap · 85.99 (local)

Why: Midea Group gained as the appliance and industrial automation giant attracted rotation from tech into consumer/industrial plays with more predictable earnings profiles.

Pattern: Relative-strength signal within a weak Shenzhen tape. Midea’s diversification into robotics and automation gives it an AI-adjacent narrative without the capex overhang dragging pure-play tech.

↓ 300750 -0.83%

Mega-cap · 387.9 (local)

Why: CATL drifted lower in sympathy with the broader tech and growth selloff. No specific catalyst — the EV battery leader tends to trade with risk sentiment across Asia’s growth complex.

Pattern: Noise-level move at -0.83% for a mega-cap. CATL remains range-bound; the dip is consistent with broad de-risking rather than any stock-specific breakdown pattern.

Japan (TSE)

↑ 7974 +2.26%

Mega-cap · 8793 (local)

Why: Nintendo extended its August rally after Q1 earnings beat expectations by 54% on FX gains and tariff refunds. The stock has gained over 25% this month, riding strong Switch 2 momentum.

Pattern: Momentum continuation on post-earnings re-rating. Nintendo is a rare defensive-growth name in Japan — gains accelerated as investors rotated out of leveraged AI plays like SoftBank.

↓ 9984 -5.33%

Mega-cap · 4975 (local)

Why: SoftBank dropped 5.3% as its planned ¥1 trillion record retail bond issuance — the largest ever by a Japanese company — raised concerns about leverage and interest costs for AI acquisitions.

Pattern: Debt-overhang selloff pattern, mirroring Alibaba’s dilution trade. The market is repricing companies that are borrowing or issuing equity aggressively for AI. Negative momentum likely persists near-term.

Singapore (SGX)

↑ U11 +0.76%

Large-cap · 40.84 (local)

Why: UOB edged higher as Singapore banks benefited from the same financial-sector rotation visible across Asia — rising yields support net interest margins and banks sit outside the tech selloff.

Pattern: Defensive bid in a -0.11% STI session. Singapore banks have been consistent relative-strength leaders in 2026. The +0.76% move is incremental, not breakout-level.

↓ H78 -0.47%

Mid-cap · 8.42 (local)

Why: Hongkong Land slipped marginally — no clear catalyst. The property developer tends to correlate with Hong Kong sentiment, which was negative on the Alibaba-driven Hang Seng selloff.

Pattern: Noise-level move at -0.47%. HK-linked property names drift with Hang Seng sentiment. No actionable pattern — check broader HK property tape for directional cues.

South Korea (KOSPI)

↑ 051910 +8.12%

Large-cap · 2.73e+05 (local)

Why: LG Chem surged 8% as activist investor Palliser Capital disclosed a stake and pushed for changes, triggering a re-rating. Rotation out of Samsung into undervalued Korean names also helped.

Pattern: Activist-catalyst breakout — Palliser’s involvement signals potential value unlock. The +8.12% move on a -3.12% KOSPI day is extreme relative strength, often a precursor to sustained re-rating.

↓ 005930 -8.70%

Mega-cap · 2.57e+05 (local)

Why: Samsung plunged 8.7% after its record ₩110 trillion shareholder-return plan disappointed — investors expected up to ₩140 trillion and wanted share buyback cancellations, which Samsung omitted.

Pattern: Expectations-gap selloff. Samsung’s return plan was record-sized but the market had priced in more. This is a sentiment reset, not a fundamental deterioration — watch for mean-reversion once positioning clears.

Taiwan (TWSE)

↑ 2382 +1.09%

Mid-cap · 325 (local)

Why: Quanta Computer gained modestly as AI server demand remained a tailwind for the ODM maker, which has been a key beneficiary of hyperscaler capex buildouts across the region.

Pattern: Relative strength in a -1.02% TAIEX session. Quanta’s server exposure gives it a differentiated AI narrative vs. chip-heavy peers like TSMC that bore the brunt of today’s selling.

↓ 2330 -1.45%

Mega-cap · 2375 (local)

Why: TSMC fell 1.45% as the broader Asia tech selloff weighed on sentiment, despite constructive news including Xiaomi partnering with TSMC for its new Xring chip and AMD’s $10 billion Taiwan investment.

Pattern: Sympathy selling with the regional tech tape — TSMC’s fundamentals remain strong but mega-cap tech was under indiscriminate pressure. The -1.45% move is modest relative to Samsung or Alibaba.

India (NSE)

↑ WIPRO +0.76%

Large-cap · 182.2 (local)

Why: Wipro gained marginally as Indian IT services names benefited from defensive positioning — rupee weakness and steady deal pipelines support the sector when global growth-tech sells off.

Pattern: Defensive rotation into IT services, which act as India’s version of consumer staples during risk-off episodes. The +0.76% is incremental, not a breakout signal.

↓ SBIN -1.50%

Large-cap · 1033 (local)

Why: State Bank of India fell 1.5% as Indian banks weakened on broader Asian risk-off sentiment. No India-specific catalyst — SBI traded down with the Nifty Bank sub-index.

Pattern: Index-weight drag — SBI is a Nifty heavyweight and tends to amplify broad market moves. The -1.5% on a -0.39% Nifty session suggests some sector-specific selling pressure in banks.

New Zealand (NZX)

↑ FPH +1.61%

Large-cap · 44.22 (local)

Why: Fisher & Paykel Healthcare rose as healthcare defensives attracted flows during the Asia tech selloff. The respiratory-device maker is a classic NZX safe-haven during risk-off sessions.

Pattern: Textbook defensive rotation — healthcare and medtech outperform when growth-tech sells off. FPH is NZ’s highest-quality large-cap and draws institutional flows in exactly this environment.

↓ SPK -0.46%

Mid-cap · 2.16 (local)

Why: Spark New Zealand dipped marginally — no specific catalyst. The telecom trades on thin volume and tends to drift with broad NZX sentiment on quiet macro days.

Pattern: Noise-level move at -0.46% for a low-beta telco. No pattern signal — Spark is a yield play that rarely generates directional momentum outside of earnings or dividend announcements.

Reading the Session

The exchange-by-exchange breakdown above surfaces both market-specific catalysts and cross-border themes. When multiple exchanges move together, look for a macro driver (USD move, commodity price, risk-on/off shift). Isolated single-exchange moves tend to reflect local earnings, regulatory news, or sector rotation.

Read next: Asia Pacific Markets · What Is a P/E Ratio? · What Is a Dividend?

AI-Augmented Stock Research

Get early access to Orbit

Orbit is Luna3.ai’s AI-augmented research engine. 12 algorithmic signals + a gradient-boosted ML model + an agentic LLM that reads each top pick’s filings and writes a daily thesis with conviction score and catalyst proximity. Three regimes, three playbooks — growth in expansion, defensives in late-cycle, recovery plays at panic bottoms. The 3 in Luna3.ai.

No spam. Unsubscribe any time.

Disclaimer

Luna3.ai content is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute personalized investment, trading, or financial advice. Some posts are researched or drafted with AI assistance and may contain mistakes; primary sources for data and claims are linked inline within each article. Always do your own research and consult a licensed advisor before making financial decisions. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Some articles on this site contain affiliate links; if you click through and complete an action — such as opening a brokerage account — Luna3.ai may earn a commission at no cost to you. This does not influence our editorial independence.

Comments
Sort by
Top comments
Newest first
Add a comment...

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!

Stay ahead of the markets.