Live widget hidden — enable in cookie settings
Yearly Top Stock Movers: May 2025-May 2026 by Cap Tier

Yearly Top Stock Movers: May 2025-May 2026 (By Market Cap)

Top stock movers past year by market cap tier - dispersion bar chart

Yearly Top Stock Movers: May 2025-May 2026 (By Market Cap)

3 views     11 hours ago
8 min read
Text Size
Key PointsAbout This Summary iAn AI tool helped create this summary based on the text of the article. The Luna3 team has checked it for accuracy and revised as necessary. Read more about how we use AI in our publishing process.
  • Ondas (ONDS) printed the biggest US-listed annual gain at roughly +868%; Lucid (LCID) was the worst, down 81%.
  • The S&P 500 returned +25% over the same window — every cap tier produced multiple winners that beat the index by more than 4x.
  • AI infrastructure (silicon turnarounds, miners-pivoting-to-HPC, satellite direct-to-device) dominated the winners; IT services squeezed by AI, EV pure-plays, and consumer-discretionary names led the losers.

The past year’s top stock movers list separates structural re-ratings from momentum fades. The stocks at the top aren’t the same names that led weekly or monthly boards — they’re the names that compounded a thesis across twelve months of tape. Ondas (ONDS) led the entire universe with a roughly +868% gain; Lucid (LCID) printed the worst return at -81%. The dispersion between best and worst tells you what kind of market this was.

How we built this top stock movers list

We pulled adjusted-close returns for every ticker in our curated ~145-name US universe over the 251 trading days from May 20, 2025 to May 19, 2026, filtered for at least $1M average daily dollar volume, and sorted by current market cap (mega ≥$200B, large $10B–$200B, mid $2B–$10B, small $300M–$2B). For each cap tier we show the top three gainers and top three losers. The cap tier is computed at today’s market cap, not last May’s — so names that re-rated upward through the year sit in the tier that screens against them today, even if they started the window two tiers lower.

For context: the S&P 500 (SPY) returned +25.2% over the same window. The Nasdaq 100 (QQQ) printed +35.5%, the Russell 2000 small-cap benchmark (IWM) +32.0%, and the Dow (DIA) +17.5%. Small-caps and Nasdaq names outpaced large-cap value by a wide margin, and the spread between the best-performing cap tier and the worst-performing single name printed at roughly 949 percentage points (ONDS +868% vs LCID -81%). That kind of internal dispersion is what makes annual cap-tier rankings useful: it isolates where the structural bid sat and where the structural bleed was.

Mega-cap leaders ($200B+)

Winners.

  • INTC +421% — Intel re-rated harder than any other mega-cap on the back of three things: Lip-Bu Tan taking over as CEO in March 2025, the US government’s $8.9B equity stake funded by CHIPS Act + Secure Enclave grants, and high-volume manufacturing on 18A starting late 2025 with Panther Lake shipping. Worth flagging: Intel was a large-cap at the start of this window (~$92B market cap, $21 share). The re-rate alone pushed it across the mega-cap threshold and back into this leaderboard.
  • AMD +265% — Hyperscaler design wins on the MI-series accelerator line plus enterprise inference traction that didn’t exist a year ago. Pattern read: steady share-take against NVDA in inference workloads, with the gross-margin profile that comes from a second-source position.
  • CAT +149% — Caterpillar isn’t a chip company, but it’s an AI-capex play. The order book for prime-power gas turbines and gensets supplying AI datacenters built across the year. The same story powering NEE, VST, and CEG showed up here on the equipment side.

Losers.

  • NFLX -25% — Ad-tier growth slowed, password-sharing tailwind faded, and the subscriber-growth print stopped impressing. Mega-cap streaming as a re-rating story is done.
  • HD -17% — Housing transaction volumes stayed depressed under high mortgage rates; project demand softened with the consumer. Notable that HD is the only mega-cap loser in our list that isn’t tech-adjacent — confirms the de-rate was a macro-rate-and-consumer story, not the AI displacement narrative weighing on NOW and ACN further down.
  • IBM -15% — Cyclical drag in consulting and infrastructure software. The AI-narrative bid that lifted enterprise software broadly didn’t extend to IBM’s mix; the multiple didn’t keep pace with the index.

Large-cap leaders ($10B–$200B)

Winners.

  • IREN +454% — Iren Limited (formerly Iris Energy) executed the cleanest bitcoin-miner-to-AI-infrastructure pivot of the cohort. New HPC contracts, GPU rollout, and a re-rating of the energy-asset base under an AI multiple. Tape pattern: classic structural breakout with rising volume.
  • HUT +454% — Hut 8 ran the same playbook as IREN with a tighter time horizon. Started this window as a small-cap (~$1.5B); is now firmly large-cap ($10.9B) on the same miner-pivot thesis. Tier re-rate is the entire story.
  • ASTS +252% — AST SpaceMobile’s direct-to-device satellite-to-cellular thesis kept compounding. Commercial deals signed with AT&T (continental US) and Verizon (October 2025), plus successful two-way broadband video calls from BlueBird satellites. CEO Avellan reiterated the 45-satellite target into year-end.

Losers.

  • NOW -50% — ServiceNow’s multiple compressed sharply. The growth-stock-with-AI-tailwind framing didn’t hold once enterprise IT spend slowed and AI integration costs showed up in operating margin.
  • RBLX -46% — Roblox bookings and DAU growth softened against a heavy expectation bar. The consumer-internet de-rating extended into the platform.
  • ACN -44% — Accenture printed the worst large-cap loss in IT services. Federal contract cuts and the perception that generative AI permanently reduces demand for labor-intensive consulting hit the multiple. Mizuho cut its price target from $309 to $280 in March 2026.

Mid-cap leaders ($2B–$10B)

Winners.

  • ONDS +868% — Ondas Holdings was the single biggest US-listed gainer in our universe. The transformation from a small-cap industrial radio business into a defense-drone platform via six 2026 acquisitions (Mistral and World View among them) lifted pro-forma backlog from ~$10M at the start of 2025 to $457M by March 31, 2026. Revenue printed +500% YoY in Q3 2025 and tenfold in Q1 2026. Started this window as a sub-$1 stock.
  • OPEN +480% — Opendoor was the textbook meme-rally of the year. Stock printed a record low of $0.51 in June 2025, then ran more than 2,000% off the bottom to $10.87 by September on a Reddit/X retail bid. The September CEO change (Kaz Nejatian) and Wu/Rabois board return is the founder-driven AI-pivot leg. Whether the rally holds is a separate question from whether it ran.
  • CIFR +397% — Cipher Mining ran the miner-pivot-to-HPC playbook from the mid-cap end. Same thesis as IREN and HUT, smaller asset base, larger percentage move because of the starting point. CIFR was a small-cap at the start of the window; the re-rate pushed it into mid-cap territory and onto this leaderboard.

Mid-cap is the tier where the structural shifts and the meme rallies overlapped the most. ONDS’ transformation from a sub-$1 stock into a defense-platform consolidator is a real-economy story. OPEN is a retail flow story. CIFR sits next to its larger cousins in a thematic bucket the market re-priced. The tape doesn’t distinguish — readers should.

Losers.

  • LCID -81% — Lucid was the worst-performing name in our entire universe. The EV pricing war, balance-sheet draw, and ongoing dilution overhang weighed across the whole year. The Saudi PIF backstop didn’t translate into multiple support.
  • MNDY -74% — monday.com saw the sharpest SaaS multiple compression in our mid-cap cohort. The story was clean: bookings decelerated, productivity-SaaS was the highest-multiple corner of software, and the de-rate found it first.
  • HIMS -63% — Hims & Hers re-rated downward on the GLP-1 transition. The FDA’s February 2026 announcement of “decisive steps” against compounded GLP-1s knocked 16% off in a session; Novo Nordisk’s lawsuit (later voluntarily dismissed) and Q1 2026 earnings miss compounded it. The platform is pivoting from compounded margins to branded distribution at lower unit economics.

Small-cap leaders ($300M–$2B)

Winners.

  • FCEL +279% — FuelCell Energy led the hydrogen rally. Fuel-cell names re-rated on the back of datacenter prime-power conversations and a thinly-traded float that amplified flow.
  • BLDP +201% — Ballard Power printed the same hydrogen rally with similar mechanics. Both names sit in the small-cap thematic basket that retail investors discovered after the AI-power story matured.
  • GLSI +155% — Greenwich LifeSciences is a binary-catalyst biotech name with a single Phase III readout (FLAMINGO-01) coming. The +155% is anticipatory positioning rather than a delivered result. Worth flagging the binary risk: a negative readout would reverse this with similar magnitude.

Losers.

  • BYND -75% — Beyond Meat continued the consumer-brand collapse. The plant-based category structurally undershipped early projections, and the balance-sheet pressure tightened across 2025.
  • ASAN -63% — Asana’s productivity-SaaS de-rate paralleled MNDY’s at the smaller end. Same story, lower multiple to start, similar magnitude decline.
  • CHPT -56% — ChargePoint’s EV-charging build-out kept burning capital faster than utilization caught up. Sits well below the small-cap threshold now at ~$140M market cap; included here because the story is a small-cap thesis that fell through the floor.

Worth noting: four names that started this window in our small-cap bucket — MVIS, BLNK, EVGO, CHPT, and SPCE — have fallen through the $300M floor into micro-cap territory. That’s a quiet structural story. The retail-favourite small-cap clean-energy and EV cohort that ran into 2021–2022 has been continuously de-rating, and the bottom of the small-cap tier is where you see it most clearly.

What the past year’s top stock movers tells us

Three patterns read across the four tiers. AI-capex was the dominant theme on the long side, and it expressed at every cap. Mega-cap had Intel’s silicon turnaround and AMD’s inference share-take. Large-cap had IREN, HUT, and the satellite-DTD story in ASTS. Mid-cap had Cipher and Ondas’ pivot-to-defense-AI. Even Caterpillar — the most boring name on this list — is an AI-capex play through gas-turbine and prime-power supply.

The losers cluster on the other side of the same trade. ServiceNow, Accenture, and the productivity-SaaS cohort (MNDY, ASAN, RBLX) all printed material de-rates as the market priced AI as a labor-replacement risk for them, not a tailwind. EV pure-plays (LCID, CHPT) and consumer-brand collapses (BYND, HIMS, FUBO-adjacent) rounded out the bottom. The dispersion between the best and worst printed at ~950 percentage points within the mid-cap tier alone (ONDS +868% vs LCID -81%) — the widest tier-internal spread in any of our multi-timeframe boards.

Compared with our past 6-month leaderboard and our past 3-month board, the annual view shows how many of the shorter-window leaders held their gains across the full year — bitcoin miners, AI-infrastructure names, and ONDS all sit on both. The year filters out the noise the daily boards can’t.

AI-Augmented Stock Research

Get early access to Orbit

Orbit is Luna3.ai’s AI-augmented research engine. 12 algorithmic signals + a gradient-boosted ML model + an agentic LLM that reads each top pick’s filings and writes a daily thesis with conviction score and catalyst proximity. Three regimes, three playbooks — growth in expansion, defensives in late-cycle, recovery plays at panic bottoms. The 3 in Luna3.ai.

No spam. Unsubscribe any time.

Disclaimer

Luna3.ai content is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute personalized investment, trading, or financial advice. Some posts are researched or drafted with AI assistance and may contain mistakes; primary sources for data and claims are linked inline within each article. Always do your own research and consult a licensed advisor before making financial decisions. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Some articles on this site contain affiliate links; if you click through and complete an action — such as opening a brokerage account — Luna3.ai may earn a commission at no cost to you. This does not influence our editorial independence.

Comments
Sort by
Top comments
Newest first
Add a comment...

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!

Stay ahead of the markets.